San Francisco Bay Area Multifamily: Why Now Is the Time to Pay Attention

Written By Erica Walters

The Bay Area multifamily market has changed dramatically. While most investors wrote off San Francisco, the market quietly repriced, fundamentals strengthened, and a real opportunity emerged. If you're wondering whether there's still money to be made in Bay Area multifamily, this breakdown shows you what's actually happening—and where the opportunity sits today.

How Banks Changed Their Lending (And Why You Should Care)

Between mid-2022 and early 2024, commercial real estate prices dropped hard. Banks completely rethought how they evaluate deals. Traditional loans at 1.15X debt service coverage get into trouble fast—just a 14% drop in income pushes the loan underwater. Now they're focused on debt yield—a simpler number that doesn't change based on interest rates. Properties with 11% debt yield can handle 50% more income loss before the loan breaks. That cushion matters when you're buying a property that needs work.

Good news: lending has loosened up. Only 9% of banks are tightening standards now (down from 67% in April 2023). But rates remain elevated—DSCR loans average around 7.47%, about 125 basis points higher than conventional financing.

The Financing Most People Don't Know About: Freddie Mac's Value-Add program lets you borrow at 85% loan-to-value with only 1.10X debt service coverage on current income—if you can prove the stabilized property will hit 1.30X coverage. Translation: you don't need a perfect building. You can buy a property with problems, at a discount, with high leverage—if you have a realistic plan to fix it. The typical path: borrow at 80% plus 100% of renovation costs using bridge financing, add mezzanine if needed to hit 85% total leverage, execute your plan over 18-24 months, then refinance into permanent agency financing at stabilization.

What's Really Happening in San Francisco

San Francisco Q3 2025: 4.4% vacancy (lowest since 2014), 7.8% rent growth year-over-year (highest in the nation), $3,300 average rent (up 6.1% annually), 2,800 units absorbed over the past year. Even B and C class properties show only 4.5% vacancy. Population grew 1.3% in 2024 after years of decline—the outflow reversed.

Broader Bay Area: 4.9% vacancy (down 60 basis points year-over-year), $2,692 average rent (up 3%), net absorption up 24% year-to-date, construction deliveries down 9%.

How This Compares Nationally: The national average rent growth sits at just 0.5% year-over-year with U.S. vacancy rates around 4.9%. The national average asking rent stands at $1,743—San Francisco commands nearly double at $3,300. Gateway markets like Chicago (3.9% rent growth) and New York (4.7%) trail San Francisco's 7.8%, while oversupplied Sun Belt markets struggle with negative growth: Austin (-4.8%), Phoenix (-3.3%), Denver (-4.1%), and Las Vegas (-1.7%).

The critical piece: units under construction dropped 35% year-over-year. San Francisco and East Bay are projecting only 1.0-1.5% new inventory growth in 2025—among the lowest rates nationally. With 24-36 month development timelines, supply stays constrained through 2027.

Distressed Deals Are Actually Closing

While fundamentals improved, distressed sales kept happening. Oakland: 1700 Webster sold for $78M (40% below assessed value), 1889 Harrison sold for $61M (47% below assessed value). San Francisco/Oakland Portfolio: PCCP bought 1,770 apartments across 76 buildings for $540.5M. Same properties traded for $750M six years ago (30% discount). PCCP paid $305K per unit versus the previous $424K per unit.

Buildings from 2019—Class A, nearly new—are trading at 50%+ discounts. Cap rates tell the story: First American Title projects compression from 5.7% to 5.2% by end of 2025. Stabilized assets trade around 4.6% caps at $331K per unit. Distressed opportunities move at $200-250K per unit. That spread is the opportunity.

Here's what that looks like: Acquire at $225K/unit, invest $25K/unit in renovations, stabilize at $1.5M NOI on a $25M basis. Exit at 5.0% cap equals $30M value. With 85% leverage, that's a 15-20% IRR on a 24-month hold—before factoring in cash flow during the hold period.

Gateway Performance at Non-Gateway Pricing: The national average multifamily price per unit stands at $213-227K as of H1 2025. Bay Area distressed deals at $200-250K/unit are trading at or below the national average, despite delivering fundamentals that rank among the nation's strongest. Compare this to other major markets: Chicago averages $252K/unit, Denver $290K/unit, and Los Angeles $339K/unit. You're acquiring a top-tier gateway market with the nation's highest rent growth at pricing comparable to secondary markets.

Sun Belt markets trade cheaper—Dallas ($157K/unit), Houston ($122K/unit), Phoenix ($170K/unit), Austin ($200K/unit)—but they're experiencing negative rent growth and oversupply. The Bay Area offers gateway market fundamentals (high rents, strong growth, supply constraints, institutional liquidity) at what should be secondary market pricing. This mispricing exists because of temporary distress, not structural problems. You're paying Phoenix prices to access San Francisco fundamentals.

Why C Class Deserves Attention

Most people chase B+ and A- properties. The real play might be C class multifamily in strong locations. The data supports it: C class rent growth 3.4% (vs 1.7% for B class, flat for A class), C class cap rates 5.38% and compressing, B/C class pricing $314K/unit average (14% below five-year average). Most Q1 2025 cap rate compression happened in C class and value-add properties—sophisticated money is moving in.

Why C class works: bigger acquisition discount, more room to add value, higher rent growth potential. A tenant paying $2,000 in a dated C class unit will pay $2,600 for renovations—that's 30% upside. Location is key. C class in a weak area stays C class. C class within a mile of BART in a gentrifying neighborhood is different.

The Regulatory Reality (Worth Understanding)

Any rent control jurisdiction in California is operationally complex and challenging to navigate. This isn't limited to San Francisco, Oakland, and Berkeley. As of November 2025, at least 13 Bay Area cities have local rent control ordinances, and over 40 California cities and counties statewide now have local rent control beyond AB 1482. Bay Area jurisdictions include: San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, East Palo Alto, Richmond, Hayward, San Jose, Mountain View, Union City, Fremont, Los Gatos, Half Moon Bay, and Alameda.

Critical Point: Cities can adopt rent control ordinances or establish rent boards at any time through ballot measures or city council action. Recent 2024 examples include Concord, Half Moon Bay, and Huntington Park. What is an unregulated market today could have strict controls tomorrow.

California's AB 1482 caps annual rent increases at 5% plus CPI, or 10% max statewide. Local cities impose stricter rules:

San Francisco: 1.4% maximum (3/1/25-2/28/26), applies to pre-6/13/79 buildings
Oakland: 0.8% maximum (8/1/25-7/31/26), applies to pre-1/1/83 buildings
Berkeley: 2.1% maximum, applies to pre-6/3/80 buildings
Mountain View: 2.7% maximum (9/1/25-8/31/26), 100% of CPI capped between 2-5%, applies to pre-2/1/95 buildings
San Jose: 5% flat annual cap, applies to pre-9/7/79 buildings

All rent-controlled jurisdictions require "just cause" to evict tenants after 12+ months. For "no-fault" evictions (owner move-ins, major renovations), you pay one month's rent as relocation assistance within 15 days. Eviction timelines run 6-12 months for contested cases.

This requires experienced local management, legal counsel who knows each jurisdiction's specific rules, and budgeting for compliance costs—relocation, extended timelines, legal fees. Regulations vary significantly city-to-city. But complexity creates a barrier that keeps out casual investors and out-of-state operators.

Here's why this matters: Regulatory complexity is a competitive advantage. Institutional buyers and out-of-state operators avoid markets requiring specialized legal counsel and extended timelines.

Important: Properties built after 2/1/95 are generally exempt from local rent control (though still subject to AB 1482). Single-family homes and separately-alienable condos are typically exempt. The 1960s-1970s multifamily buildings we're discussing fall within rent control in most cities. Always verify specific exemption dates and rules for your target jurisdiction.

What to Look For

The Target: B and C class multifamily, 40-250 units, built 1960s-1970s. Solid construction but deferred maintenance, inefficient management, rents 15-30% below market. Focus on Peninsula and South Bay markets—Silicon Valley, San Mateo County, and surrounding areas—where tech employment drives consistent demand. Properties closer to San Francisco can hold value well, but the Peninsula and South Bay offer the most compelling risk-adjusted opportunities due to sustained high demand from the tech sector. 1960s-1970s vintage hits the sweet spot: strong bones with enough deferred capital needs to justify repositioning.

The 40-unit minimum is critical: smaller properties destabilize quickly under value-add execution. At 30 units, losing three tenants creates 10% vacancy; at 40 units, the same loss is 7.5%. Properties under 40 units can't absorb fixed costs (management, legal, compliance) efficiently, and when you're rolling renovations with high leverage, you need operational buffer. Lenders and exit buyers also prefer 40+ units for cash flow stability.

The Numbers: Bridge financing at 80% LTV plus 100% renovation budget. Add mezzanine if needed to reach 85% combined leverage. Current debt service coverage can be 1.10-1.15X using agency value-add programs, but you need a documented path to 1.30X at stabilization. Minimum 11% debt yield on stabilized basis. Target 20-25% NOI improvement through renovations and better management. Assume exit cap rates of 4.8-5.2%.

The Timeline: Months 1-6: Close, plan, start improvements. Months 7-18: Roll renovations, transition management, reach market rents. Months 19-24: Hit stabilization, refinance into permanent agency financing.

Returns: With distressed pricing at $200-250K/unit versus market at $331K/unit, you're buying at 24-40% discount. Add 20-25% NOI improvement plus cap rate compression from 5.7% to 5.2%, you're creating value three ways: acquisition discount, operational improvement, market appreciation.

Risk Management: Budget for regulatory compliance—legal review, relocation assistance, extended timelines. Keep management reserves. Underwrite rent growth conservatively using 3-year trailing averages. Make sure you have exit flexibility. If refinancing isn't favorable at month 24, can you hold and cash flow?

Who This Play Is For

This opportunity requires execution capability: agency lending relationships, local operational expertise, and $3-10M equity per deal. It's not for first-time investors or anyone needing immediate cash flow. But for operators with Bay Area experience or strong local partnerships, the risk-adjusted returns are compelling.

Why This Window Is Closing

Construction at decade lows with 24-36 month delivery lag. Population growth returned. AI employment expanding. Distressed sellers capitulating now—by late 2025/early 2026, most inventory will have cleared. Cap rate compression started Q3 2024 and continues through 2025. Institutional buyer sentiment shifted positive in Q2. Bid-ask spreads tightening. Once the distressed wave clears and pricing firms up, you're no longer buying at 30-50% discounts. You're competing with institutional capital on stabilized pricing.

Bottom Line

The Bay Area opportunity comes down to three things: strong fundamentals (low vacancy, rent growth, constrained supply), distressed pricing (30-50% below peak), and financing that works (agency value-add at 85% LTV). Regulatory complexity creates a barrier to entry that limits competition for operators set up properly. The data supports the thesis. The financing is available. The distressed pipeline is real. Success requires execution—finding the right assets, underwriting conservatively, and having the operational sophistication to navigate California's regulatory framework.

Sources

Commercial Real Estate & Underwriting:

San Francisco & Bay Area Market Data:

National Market Comparisons:

Distressed Transactions:

Cap Rates & Valuations:

Regulatory Information:

Legal Disclaimer This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or financial advice. The information provided is based on publicly available sources and is subject to change. Always consult with a qualified tax professional, attorney, or financial advisor before making investment or tax-related decisions. Ownership Theory assumes no liability for any actions taken based on this content.

Erica Walters
Previous

Supply Drought Ahead? What the Construction Data Means for Your Property Value
Next

New California Housing Laws for 2026: What You Need to Know